47Tuc
(m-M)_0=13.30   E(B-V)=0.04
wz803y256aes_agb.t610000_c04ext   10 Gyr  [Fe/H]=-0.7 alpha-enhanced
wz803y256aes_agb.t611000_c04ext   11 Gyr  [Fe/H]=-0.7 alpha-enhanced
Comparison figure (by SCT)

M67
(m-M)_0=9.69  E(B-V)=0.018
wzsunysunsss_agb.t603500_c04ext   3.5 Gyr  [Fe/H]=0.06 scaled solar no-oversh.
wzsunysunsss_agb.t604000_c04ext   4.0 Gyr  [Fe/H]=0.06 scaled solar no-oversh.
Comparison figure (by SCT)

NGC6528
(m-M)_0=14.52 E(B-V)=0.56
wz402y303aes_agb.t608000_c04ext     8 Gyr  [Fe/H]=0.05 ([M/H]=0.4) alpha-enhanced
wz402y303aes_agb.t609000_c04ext     9 Gyr  [Fe/H]=0.05 ([M/H]=0.4) alpha-enhanced
wz402y303aes_agb.t610000_c04ext    10 Gyr  [Fe/H]=0.05 ([M/H]=0.4) alpha-enhanced
Comparison figure (by SCT)

NGC1805
(m-M)_0 between 18.3 and 18.5  E(B-V) ~ 0.06 - 0.07
wz803y256sso_agb.t600030_c04ext  30 Myr  [Fe/H]=-0.35 scaled solar oversh.
wz803y256sso_agb.t600050_c04ext  50 Myr  [Fe/H]=-0.35 scaled solar oversh.
wzsunysunsso_agb.t600030_c04ext  30 Myr  [Fe/H]=0.06  scaled solar oversh.
wzsunysunsso_agb.t600040_c04ext  40 Myr  [Fe/H]=0.06  scaled solar oversh.
Comparison figure (by SCT)

NGC1868
(m-M)_0 between 18.2 and 18.5  E(B-V) ~ 0.06 - 0.07
wz102y259sso_agb.t600900_c04ext 900 Myr [Fe/H]=-0.25 scaled solar oversh.
wz102y259sso_agb.t601000_c04ext 1 Gyr [Fe/H]=-0.25 scaled solar oversh.
wzsunysunsso_agb.t600800_c04ext 800 Myr [Fe/H]=0.06 scaled solar oversh.
Comparison figure (by SCT)

Note from Maurizio Salaris:

NGC1805 and NGC1868: The CMD suffers from heavy field
contamination, the distance (the red clump in the CMD is the red clump
of the field, it does not belong to the cluster) reddening and [Fe/H]
are not well determined, so that there is a large range of ages and
[Fe/H] compatible withe the CMD and LF I got from the webpage.